I recently saw a post from Lafayette College announcing that Lin-Manuel Miranda will speak at the school on Feb. 12, 2026.
After some research, I found that Lehigh University has hosted numerous influential speakers, including its Compelling Perspectives series, which featured former U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May and former U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta discussing national security. Other speakers, such as journalist Katie Couric, Marty Baron and V Spehar, have spoken at Lehigh regarding the evolving role of media.
More recently, figures such as Arianna Huffington and Senator Dave McCormick have tackled the ethical and political stakes of artificial intelligence. Lehigh also hosted Carl Bernstein, one of the legendary journalists who broke the Watergate scandal, in 2019. Moravian also hosted Bernstein in 2017 as the Cohen Arts & Lecture speaker, but we have lacked speakers since.
Moravian prides itself on cultivating critical thinkers, yet its speaker programming tells a different story. While our campus lacks speakers in general, when we do host, we cycle through forgettable lectures that rarely challenge power or spark sustained conversation; while nearby, Lehigh University has built a speaker series that engages with the students of the university, their interests, and even speakers they may not be familiar with, but are still curious in learning about.
Why does Moravian, a university that pledges how it values civic engagement and intellectual rigor, consistently fail to offer its students speakers with comparable relevance, range, or impact?
Moravian has silently stopped hosting speakers through the In-Focus program in the last few years, which was one of the few programs that brought speakers to the school. I remember vividly attending and covering the Down with Diet Culture Lecture hosted by Katie Bongiorno, LMFT, my freshman year in 2022, and I do not know of any other speakers or program at Moravian that hosts similar speakers or events (besides the Moravian Story Summit.)
Reeves Library also offers research chats and author speakers, but these are funded from its own budget.
The only notable speakers I have been able to find in the last 25 years are Bill Cosby, who came to Moravian in 2014 (pre-conviction, but post-allegations), and James Franco in 2016 (who was also facing allegations of sexual assault, and before further allegations later arose). In 2019, Drake Bell performed at Moravian College Orientation, before his allegations.
Now, out of every celebrity I could find, we brought three comedians who were in the process of receiving – or prior to – their sexual assault allegations.
And, the most disappointing aspect is that we have led monumental speakers and events at Moravian. In 1990, former President Jimmy Carter spoke at Moravian; how do we go from former president of the U.S., to disgraced comedians?
I do want to highlight that the Moravian Writers’ Conference, recently renamed The Story Summit, has always led some amazing conversations and guest speakers. My personal favorites have been No River Twice, an improv spoken word group, and Shining Light, which highlights creative work from incarcerated people.
But, there should be more options for students to attend guest speakers. The lack of these speakers has consequences: they are one of the few ways students encounter ideas and people outside the classroom who are actively shaping politics, culture, law and media. This is priming students to think critically, argue ethically and engage civically, especially with disciplines outside of the classroom, or their specific field.
A lack of various speakers is also a competitive failure; we compete with schools like Lehigh and Lafayette for students, tuition dollars and legitimacy. Speaker programming is one of the most visible ways a university signals seriousness and relevance. When prospective students see Lin-Manuel Miranda at Lafayette and former heads of state and investigative journalists at Lehigh, and nothing comparable here – I know what decision I would make when looking into LVAIC schools.
Whether Moravian intends it or not, the institution looks disconnected from the world it claims to prepare students for.
Who decides which speakers matter? Where does the funding go? Can students petition for a notable speaker to come back to Moravian? These are not unreasonable demands; a university that claims to value civic engagement and intellectual rigor should be able to answer them.
Moravian does not lack students hungry for ideas, nor faculty committed to critical inquiry, nor the resources to invite the world onto campus. What it lacks is the will to do so consistently. And until that changes, Moravian will continue to talk about preparing students for the real world, while refusing to let that world through the door.

Kris Beutler • Feb 20, 2026 at 12:53 am
Hi Liz,
I really appreciate seeing this dialogue. Student voices matter in shaping programming and campus culture.
As an alumna who was on campus when several of the speakers you mentioned visited, I can share a bit of historical context. Many of those events were organized through IMPACT (the former student activities council). Typically, academic departments invited notable figures within their disciplines, while student organizations focused more on pop culture, comedy, or entertainment-based programming.
I’m always glad to see students thinking critically about what they want their campus experience to look like.
Dr. Chris Hunt • Feb 13, 2026 at 1:07 pm
Response to “No Cool Speakers At Moravian: What The Heck?”
The author raises an important question about the role of speaker programming in shaping intellectual life on campus. However, the article is not well-sourced, and the research is incomplete.
Based on my direct experience attending and hosting campus speakers, I can point to several without needing to go back 25 years. The dates I’ll list are approximate, but the following internationally-known speakers have been speakers:
-Reverend Jesse Jackson (2011), civil rights leader and former presidential candidate
-Michelle Obama (2012), First Lady of the U.S.
-Congressman John Lewis (2015), civil rights icon and longtime U.S. Representative
-Tim Wise (2014), author and anti-racism educator
-Maria Hinojosa (2015), award-winning journalist and founder of Futuro Media
-Dr. Michael Eric Dyson (2016), author, scholar, and public intellectual
-Irshad Manji (2016), author and advocate for reform within Muslim communities
-Keenan Thompson (2017), comedian and longtime cast member of Saturday Night Live
-Gopalkrishna Gandhi (2019), former diplomat, author, and grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, who spoke on global leadership and ethics
-Deepak Chopra (2022), author and public figure focused on health, wellness, and spirituality
These are individuals who have shaped national and international conversations across civil rights, journalism, public policy, media, global affairs, and culture.
The comparison to Lafayette and Lehigh also requires context. These are strong neighboring Lehigh Valley institutions with whom Moravian maintains positive relationships. At the same time, they operate with different financial models. The total cost of attendance at these schools is between $88 to 93K per year. Their endowments exceed $1 billion and $2 billion, respectively, while Moravian’s is closer to $175 million, which is strong, but not $1B. Those differences shape the scale and frequency of large, high-cost speaker programming. They are excellent neighbors, not competitors.
Where the article is most helpful is in its forward-looking concern. Students benefit from opportunities to engage with influential voices beyond the classroom.
For future pieces, I would be happy to help point the paper toward sources that can strengthen the reporting. A quick message to our archivist in the library could have assisted in the piece.
Ultimately, this was absolutely engaging and thought-provoking, and I THANK YOU for your consistent and tireless work in our student newspaper!!!
c • Feb 13, 2026 at 9:04 pm
It’s unfortunate that all the speakers listed in this comment were in the era before any current student has been at Moravian. I would 1000% attend most, if not all, of the speaker events mentioned here. But Moravian at the institutional level hasn’t brought in anyone of the same scale in recent years. I think that’s what the author is trying to get at.
Also, the only person who current students may have been able to listen to would be Deepak Chopra. A quick Google search of his name would reveal that he was in the Epstein files and did some pretty abhorrent stuff.
MaryJo Rosania Harvie • Feb 1, 2026 at 6:51 pm
I also would disagree that Moravian doesn’t host relevant and impactful speakers. As the chair of the The Arts and Lectures Committee, I can tell you that we have funded a variety of extremely relevant speakers and workshops over the past few years.
Although they may not have the “star power” of Lin-Manuel Miranda (and sure, I’ll admit, I am pretty jealous of that one!), these speakers are extremely noteworthy and chosen with care and consideration of our student’s interests. Often, the visitors to campus are chosen for their availability and willingness to engage with students on a deeper level. Some examples of recent past speakers & events include:
– Disability & Inclusion film and talk
– Moravian “Write to Explore” Conference 2024, 2025, 2026
– Healthcare “After the storm: a view from the front”
– Emily Wilcox Talk – Revolutionary Bodies: Chinese Dance and the Sociality Legacy
– Excavating Bethlehem Steel’s Mining History in Brazil By Dr. Cory Fischer-Hoffman
– K-Pop goes global
“- The Intersection of Art and Activism: Organizing and Advocacy for Asian
Americans Post COVID-19”
– Resilience in Crisis: Understanding Trauma and Supporting First Responders
– Brain Awareness Week
– Dr. Li Ke’s Talk – Marriage Unbound
– “Safeguarding Care: Interprofessional Strategies for Preventing and Responding to Healthcare Violence”
– Health Humanities Night of the Arts
Additionally, in the Art Department we have hosted two recent Ackerman Lectures, which invited practicing artists to give a talk and work with students in an extended workshop. Recently, we have hosted Chakaia Booker & Blackburn Printing Studio and Krystle Lemonias.
I agree with Dr. Rhodes, this claim overlooked the extensive efforts of the faculty, and the support we are given to provide our students with high quality, accessible speakers for our students.
Best,
Dr. MaryJo Rosania Harvie
adviser • Feb 7, 2026 at 10:47 pm
Thank you for taking the time to respond and for outlining the work of the Arts and Lectures Committee and the Art Department. I want to be clear that my intention was not to dismiss or diminish the substantial effort faculty and staff put into bringing speakers and programming to campus. I recognize that these events are carefully selected, often resource-intensive, and genuinely meaningful to many students.
Rather, I was pointing to a gap in scale, visibility, and consistency when Moravian’s programming is compared to that of peer institutions we directly compete with, such as Lehigh and Lafayette. Many of the events you list are academically rich and important, but they tend to circulate within specific departments or interest groups and often do not register as institution-wide moments that signal Moravian’s intellectual presence beyond campus.
When I referenced “forgettable” lectures, I did not mean that the content itself lacked merit. I was pointing out that speaker programming has decreased over the last few years at Moravian, especially since In-Focus would hold multiple lectures a year, and it has now been discontinued. Events designed for deep engagement with smaller groups are valuable, but they serve a different function than high-visibility speakers who create shared campus discourse and external recognition.
I also mention the Writer’s Conference in my article, as well as the events they have hosted that were impactful to me, which is now renamed the Story Summit; perhaps you may have missed that in your reading of this article.
I also want to clarify that my comparison to Lehigh and Lafayette was not about celebrity for its own sake. “Star power” matters not because of fame alone, but because it draws attention, signals institutional priorities, and invites students into conversations they might not otherwise encounter. Those institutions manage to combine accessibility, engagement, and public relevance in a way that Moravian has done successfully at points in its history, but not with the same consistency in recent years. This is an avenue the President’s Office needs to consider — not departments, as I’m assuming they do not have the means to fund more “famous” speakers.
I appreciate your response and the work you and your colleagues do to bring thoughtful programming to campus, as I have attended many of these events and even reported on them. My hope in raising these concerns was to push a larger conversation about how Moravian can better align its speaker programming with its stated commitments to civic engagement, intellectual rigor, and competitiveness—not to discount the value of what already exists.
Best,
Liz
Madison Snyder • Jan 30, 2026 at 10:18 pm
Hey! Don’t forget about the Sipple lecture
Samuel Rhodes • Jan 30, 2026 at 11:58 am
I was disappointed by the article’s claim that Moravian does not host impactful or relevant speakers. During my relatively short tenure at the university, I have personally invited several speakers whose work is nationally significant and directly aligned with Moravian’s stated commitments to civic engagement and intellectual rigor, including Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar, Chuck Black of the Fair Elections Center, and political professional Elizabeth Scardino, who also met with and mentored political science students.
In addition, my colleagues across campus have invited a wide range of scholars and public intellectuals, including Dr. Ke Li (John Jay College of Criminal Justice), Dr. Daigengna Duoer (Boston University), Dr. Heng Du (Wellesley College), and Dr. Emily Wilcox, a Fulbright Scholar from William & Mary. These visits involved lectures, discussions, and direct engagement with students.
These speakers are neither marginal nor forgettable. Their omission from the article presents an incomplete picture of recent speaker programming at Moravian and overlooks the substantial efforts faculty continue to make to bring meaningful voices to campus.
-Dr. Samuel Rhodes
J • Feb 4, 2026 at 9:17 am
I know who none of these people are, respectively.
adviser • Feb 7, 2026 at 10:50 pm
Hi, Dr. Rhodes,
Thank you for your message and for taking the time to outline the speakers you and your colleagues have brought to campus. I want to acknowledge that the individuals you name are nationally significant, intellectually rigorous, and meaningfully aligned with Moravian’s commitments to civic engagement. I have attended and reported on several of these events myself, and I do not consider their work marginal or unimportant.
My intention in the article was not to erase or discredit faculty efforts, nor to suggest that Moravian has never hosted impactful speakers. Rather, I was pointing to a broader, structural concern about scale, visibility, and consistency in speaker programming—especially when Moravian is compared to peer institutions like Lehigh and Lafayette, with whom we directly compete for students, tuition, and institutional reputation.
Many of the speakers you list were academically rich and deeply valuable, but they were often housed within specific departments or programs and experienced primarily by students already connected to those spaces. Events designed for smaller-scale engagement absolutely matter, but they serve a different institutional function than high-visibility speakers who create shared, campus-wide moments and signal Moravian’s intellectual presence beyond the university. That distinction was central to my argument.
When I used the phrase “forgettable,” I did not mean that the content of these lectures lacked merit. I was referencing the decline in frequency and prominence of speaker programming in recent years, particularly following the discontinuation of the In-Focus program and The Cohen Arts & Lectures Series, which previously hosted multiple lectures each year. From a student perspective, this shift has changed how often—and how visibly—outside voices enter campus discourse.
My comparison to Lehigh and Lafayette was not about celebrity for its own sake. “Star power” matters insofar as it draws attention, signals institutional priorities, and invites students into broader public conversations they may not otherwise encounter. In my view, this is an area that requires institutional-level investment—particularly from the President’s Office—rather than something departments should be expected to shoulder on their own.
I appreciate your response and the work you and your colleagues continue to do to bring meaningful voices to campus. My hope in raising these concerns was to prompt a larger, good-faith conversation about how Moravian can better align its speaker programming with its stated commitments to civic engagement, intellectual rigor, and competitiveness—not to discount the value of what already exists.
Best,
Liz